The Immoral and Evil Insurance Companies

As the Obama administration watched their poll numbers plummet in regard to health care reform (and the public option in particular), they began trying to reshape what the debate was about.  Instead of continuing the positive tone of making sure everyone is covered and lowering costs, they went negative, attacking and vilifying the insurance companies.  They even stopped using the phrase “health care reform” and started using “health insurance reform”.  I suppose they thought they could reshape the debate from making health care affordable to, “Let’s get the evil money grubbing insurance companies!”  The President’s recent weekly address was an outright attack on the insurance companies.

At about the 4 minute mark, President Obama begins to talk about the profits of the insurance companies.  He said, “The fact is, the insurance industry is making this last ditch effort to stop reform, even as costs continue to rise and our health care dollars continue to be poured into their profits, bonuses and administrative costs.”

President Obama isn’t the only one to attack the insurance companies over their profits.  Nancy Pelosi recently said, “”I’m very pleased that (Democratic leaders) will be talking, too, about the immoral profits being made by the insurance industry and how those profits have increased in the Bush years.”

Are the insurance companies really making obscene profits that are causing our premiums to rise?  According to an article from the AP the answer is no, unless you think that farm and construction machinery, Tupperware, the railroads, Hershey sweets, Molson Coors Brewing, Yum food brands and Yahoo? are all gouging us to increase their profits.  All of these companies have a higher profit margin than health insurance companies.

According to the AP,

In the health care debate, Democrats and their allies have gone after insurance companies as rapacious profiteers making “immoral” and “obscene” returns while “the bodies pile up.”

Ledgers tell a different reality. Health insurance profit margins typically run about 6 percent, give or take a point or two. That’s anemic compared with other forms of insurance and a broad array of industries, even some beleaguered ones…

…Health insurers posted a 2.2 percent profit margin last year, placing them 35th on the Fortune 500 list of top industries. As is typical, other health sectors did much better – drugs and medical products and services were both in the top 10.

The railroads brought in a 12.6 percent profit margin. Leading the list: network and other communications equipment, at 20.4 percent.

HealthSpring, the best performer in the health insurance industry, posted 5.4 percent. That’s a less profitable margin than was achieved by the makers of Tupperware, Clorox bleach and Molson and Coors beers.

The star among the health insurance companies did, however, nose out Jack in the Box restaurants, which only achieved a 4 percent margin.

UnitedHealth Group, reporting third quarter results last week, saw fortunes improve. It managed a 5 percent profit margin on an 8 percent growth in revenue.

Van Hollen is right that premiums have more than doubled in a decade, according to a Kaiser Family Foundation study that found a 131 percent increase.

But were the Bush years golden ones for health insurers?

Not judging by profit margins, profit growth or returns to shareholders. The industry’s overall profits grew only 8.8 percent from 2003 to 2008, and its margins year to year, from 2005 forward, never cracked 8 percent.

The latest annual profit margins of a selection of products, services and industries: Tupperware Brands, 7.5 percent; Yahoo, 5.9 percent; Hershey, 6.1 percent; Clorox, 8.7 percent; Molson Coors Brewing, 8.1 percent; construction and farm machinery, 5 percent; Yum Brands (think KFC, Pizza Hut, Taco Bell), 8.5 percent.

If the average profit margin of the insurance companies is currently around 2% , are their profits really the reason our health care costs are so high? Why would the President and other Democrats criticize the profits of health insurance companies when their profit margin is so small? Perhaps the answer is that all profit is evil, at least according to the President and other liberals. This would be right in stride with the march towards socialism that our country is on.  According to the Communist party USA, Capitalism is flawed because it tries to “maximize profit on the backs of the working class”.  This sounds similar to what the president has been saying about insurance profits hurting the average person.  Socialist believe profit is wrong, therefore the insurance companies should be vilified for making any profit, no matter how small.  Is there another reason, other than profit being evil, for the President to claim that a 2% profit margin is too high?

Related posts:

  1. How Will Obama’s Health Care Plan Lower Costs?
  2. Obama Thinks Doctors are Greedy?
  3. The Real Reason Democrats Want to Pass Health Care Reform
  4. The White House is Backing Away From the Public Option in Health Care Reform. Victory for Conservatives?

Click here to subscribe to Forgotten Liberty

Comments (8)

Matt

October 25th, 2009 at 9:09 pm    


Well, that’s it, I say we go after the OMG EVIIIIL Tupperware! It’s plastic so not only do they make OMG OBSCENE PROFITS, but they probably have an OMG HUGE CARBON FOOTPRINT.

(Sighs), that feels better! Been holding in the sarcasm all day.

jwruss

October 26th, 2009 at 9:06 am    


Great insight. Wish everyone did their homework in this country!


[...] the original post: The Immoral and Evil Insurance Companies | forgottenliberty.com Share and [...]

Burro

October 26th, 2009 at 6:56 pm    


I don’t disagree with your argument, and I would never argue against the virtuous activity of earning a profit. However, the health insurance industry is profitable largely because they are subsidized. Medicare does an extremely effective job of taking some of the highest risk customers out of the system. Health insurance companies are therefore allowed to cherry-pick the most profitable customers at the expense of the tax payer. This problem will only be amplified by demographics. I think the better argument here is to investigate why the insurance companies aren’t more profitable than they are, given the huge competitive advantage they have. Probably the answer to this conundrum is that the profits of insurance companies are cannibalized by inflationary costs that are largely a result of their partner in crime: the federal government. What we have is a system that is mutually destructive. There is a massive market distortion going on, where the private sector isn’t allowed to be efficient. I have a hard time seeing how a “public option” solves this problem. I am not a fan of the government nor I am I a fan of health insurance companies. They are both indefensible in my book.

uberVU - social comments

October 27th, 2009 at 6:19 am    


Social comments and analytics for this post…

This post was mentioned on Twitter by ForgotLiberty: The immoral and evil profits of the health insurance companies– http://alturl.com/yjhv...

theLibertyPen

October 27th, 2009 at 2:19 pm    


Great article FL. You purvey some excellent points, as does Burro in the comments section. Politicians discuss social policies by way of misdirection, a small element of truth in an otherwise perverted distortion of an entire position.

Ron Russell

November 1st, 2009 at 1:10 pm    


Insurance companies are being tagged as greedy, currupt money grubbers with their only motive being profit. They are being condemned for screening those they issue policies too. The auto insurance companies all give better rates to safe drivers than to those who often have accidents. Private companies are NOT in business for the fun of it, but rather to make profit. Those folks who are at high risk for certain medical reasons should be issued insurance, but insurance with a high premium. That may sound cruel, but then nothing is fair in life. Hospitals will not in most cases turn away someone with a life threatening medical condition. The governments track record in not good when it comes to managing health services and to turn over the system entirely to the government would be crazy. And the proposed Obamacare would in the end lead to a single-payer system throughout the country.

Leave a reply

Name *

Mail *

Website